Historic Districts

Urban Renewal and the Revitalization of Historic Buildings

Practical approaches to rehabilitating individual old buildings, including repair standards, building code issues, hidden problems and realistic cost considerations.

On this page
  1. Starting with the building, not the plan
  2. Assessment first
  3. Repair standards
  4. Typical repair issues
  5. Building codes and older structures
  6. Costs
  7. Finding a use that fits
  8. Keeping the building maintained

Starting with the building, not the plan

Rehabilitating a historic building is different from building a new one. The existing structure sets limits, hides surprises and holds value that is easy to damage. The most reliable projects tend to begin with understanding the building before deciding what to do with it.

Assessment first

A thorough early assessment usually has several parts.

  • Research into the building’s history, previous alterations and original materials, using records, drawings and photographs.
  • Physical survey of the structure, roof, walls, windows, floors, plumbing, wiring and heating, ideally by professionals experienced with older construction.
  • Identification of significance: which features matter most, such as a staircase, a storefront, a cornice or a room layout, and which are less important or already altered.
  • Moisture and structural investigation, since water is the most common cause of damage.
  • Hazard check for lead paint, asbestos and other materials common in older buildings.

This stage resembles the feasibility studies used in other kinds of projects. It costs money, but finding problems on paper is usually cheaper than finding them during construction.

Repair standards

Many preservation systems use similar guiding principles for work on historic buildings. In general terms they say:

  1. Use a building for a purpose that needs little change to its important features.
  2. Retain and repair original materials and features where possible.
  3. Do not add false historical features.
  4. Replace only what is too deteriorated to repair, and match it in appearance and, where possible, material.
  5. Make new additions and alterations distinguishable from the old and compatible with it.
  6. Choose gentle cleaning and repair methods. Harsh techniques such as abrasive blasting can harm old masonry and wood.
  7. Make changes in a way that could, in principle, be reversed without damaging the original.

These ideas are guides rather than rigid rules, and reviewers apply them with judgment. Where public money, tax credits or designation are involved, following published standards is often a condition, and plans are checked before work begins. The details differ by place.

Typical repair issues

Roofs and drainage. Water getting in is the biggest threat. Often the first and best investment is a sound roof, working gutters and good drainage.

Masonry. Old brick and stone often used soft lime mortar. Repointing with a harder cement mortar can trap moisture and damage the bricks, which is why compatible materials matter.

Windows. Original windows can often be repaired, weatherstripped and supplemented with storm windows, which costs differently from replacement and affects appearance and energy use.

Timber. Rot and insect damage should be treated at the cause, usually moisture.

Structure. Foundations, beams and floors may be undersized by modern standards or weakened over time. Strengthening should be done by qualified engineers.

Services. Wiring, plumbing and heating are commonly updated. Routing new pipes and ducts without destroying important rooms is a design challenge.

Building codes and older structures

Codes cover fire safety, structural strength, exits, accessibility, energy performance and more. Bringing an old building fully up to the standard for new construction can be difficult or damaging. Many jurisdictions therefore have provisions for existing or historic buildings that allow alternative ways to meet safety goals, for example a sprinkler system in place of rebuilding stairs, or fire-rated assemblies that preserve a historic door. How much flexibility exists, and how consistently officials apply it, varies widely.

Key issues include:

  • Fire safety: exits, separation between floors, alarms and sprinklers.
  • Accessibility: ramps, lifts and toilets. Historic buildings with steps and narrow doorways need careful design, and the aims of universal design may be met only partly.
  • Structural and seismic safety, which can be expensive.
  • Change of use: converting a building to a different use may trigger additional requirements.
  • Energy: requirements for insulation and windows may conflict with preserving original fabric.

Early conversations with code officials and preservation staff often prevent costly redesign.

Costs

Costs for historic work are uncertain and depend on the building, region and market. Some points hold in general.

  • Contingency matters. Hidden conditions often emerge once walls and floors are opened, so budgets typically include a reserve for unexpected work.
  • Skilled labor can be scarce and costly, especially for traditional crafts.
  • Cheaper is not always cheaper. A low-cost fix that fails early, such as an inappropriate sealant, can lead to bigger bills.
  • Carrying costs add up. Interest, insurance and taxes continue while a project is delayed.
  • Benefits are not purely financial. Value may come from retained character, avoided demolition and community meaning, which do not appear in a spreadsheet.

A simple hypothetical illustration: suppose estimated construction costs are 500,000 dollars and the owner sets aside a 15 percent contingency. The contingency is 75,000 dollars (500,000 times 0.15), bringing the budget to 575,000 dollars. If hidden problems consume more than that, the owner needs additional funds or must cut scope. The figures are invented and real projects vary.

A building owner can often reduce the risk by phasing work, starting with weatherproofing and structural stabilization and leaving finishes for later. Basic building stabilization can protect a vacant building while money is raised.

Finding a use that fits

The best use is one that the building can accommodate without heavy changes and that generates enough income or public benefit to pay for upkeep. Large open spaces suit workshops or markets; small rooms suit offices or homes; ground floors suit shops or services. A use that requires gutting the interior is a warning sign. Market demand matters, since an empty building does not stay restored for long.

Keeping the building maintained

Rehabilitation is not the end. A maintenance plan, including regular inspection of roofs, gutters and joints, protects the investment. Many failures happen not during renovation but years later when upkeep lapses.

Every old building is different, and no general guide can replace a qualified professional’s advice on a particular property.

The complete guide to historic districts

Revitalizing Historic Districts: Urban Development Strategies
Read the guide

Keep exploring

Guides from other topics

All topics →